Editorial Policy

Factual claims should be checked against appropriate sources before publication. Where information depends on a platform’s official documentation, that documentation is cited.

Published pages should provide original organization, analysis, testing or explanation rather than copying platform marketing language.

Research-only content and hands-on testing must be clearly distinguished on every page. See the evidence types we use.

Affiliate compensation must not determine:

• Ratings
• Conclusions
• Inclusion of limitations
• Whether a platform is covered
• Correction decisions

Where practical, platforms may be contacted for clarification or comment. Lack of response must not be presented as proof of wrongdoing.

Public complaints may be considered, but anonymous statements should not be treated as verified facts without supporting evidence.

Content must not promise:

• Guaranteed earnings
• Guaranteed qualification
• Guaranteed approval
• Guaranteed product selection
• Guaranteed sweepstakes winnings
• Guaranteed employment

Content must not encourage:

• False profile details
• VPN use to bypass country restrictions
• Multiple prohibited accounts
• Identity misrepresentation
• Avoiding verification rules

Software tools may assist with organization, formatting, research planning or editing. Published factual claims, ratings and conclusions must still be reviewed against appropriate evidence. AI-generated text must not be used as a substitute for platform verification or genuine hands-on testing.

A page must not claim that a human checked it unless that review actually occurred.

Material relationships that may affect perceived independence must be disclosed.

See our Corrections Policy.

Questions or concerns about editorial standards can be sent via our contact page.